DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE [001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906
SIN
Docket No: 1286-14
13 Mareh 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your-
, naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute 'o
limitations and consider your application on its merits, A
three-member panel of the ‘Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on °
24 February 2015. The names and votes -of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and’ procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, requlations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice,
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
9 October 1984, On 15 May 1986, you were the subject of a ;
psychiatric evaluation after making a suicidal ideation. You
were diagnosed with a severe personality disorder. On 20 May
1986, you were notified of pending administrative separation
action by reason of convenience of the government due to the
diagnosed personality disorder, You elected to waive the rights
to consult counsel, or submit a statement. On 23 May 1986, your
commanding officer forwarded your case to the separation .
authority recommending that you be discharged. The separation
authority concurred and directed that you receive an honorable
discharge. You were so Gischarged on 5 June 1996.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your record of service, medical issues and desire to change the
reason for your discharge. Nevertheless, the Board found that .
these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the reason
for your discharge given the diagnoses of a personality disorder
and suicidal ideation. Accordingly, your application has been
enied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probabie material
error or injustice.
ROBERT J. O‘ NEIL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Sep 25 09_39_27 CDT 2000
Administrative separation was again The You were honorably discharged on 30 April 1986 by reason of “Other Physical/Mental Condition-Personality Disorder” and assigned an RE—4 reenlistment code. The discharge processing However, no The fact that The Board noted You In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful search of your record for any mitigating factors which might warrant a change in the reason for your discharge. reenlistment code to individuals discharged by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1630 14
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service given your diagnoses of a personality disorder, and suicidal ideation, | Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04029-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 04029-08 5 February 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07927-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2011. You were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04177-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 December 2002 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board found that these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00937-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00441-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06664-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 10 March 1988, you were notified that administrative discharge procedures were initiated and that you would receive a general discharge and a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11385-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that the severity of your diagnosed personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07460-09
RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. The discharge authority directed your commanding officer to discharge you under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...